Disclaimer: In an effort to foster a better informed citizenry with regard to its local affairs, eastboston.com provides these documents in electronic form as a public service. EBOL bears no responsibility for typographical errors. Contact the document writers for hard copies. Some documents have been scanned;others have been obtained through e-mail and cut and pasted here. Please send comments and suggestions to editor@eastboston.com

East Boston - Chelsea Creek Action Group
Meeting Minutes --  January 15, 2003

MEETING MINUTES – January 15, 2003

Attending: Leigh Hall, Lucy Del Muto, Ana Maria Gomez, Nancei Radicchi, Roberta Horn, Arthur Horn, Robertson Ward, Grace Zuccaro, Aldo Ciraoe, Maddy McComiskey, Mary Ellen Welch, Patricia Fidler, Susan Voloshian, Christopher Blackler, Louis Silvestro (Channel Fish), Todd Kohr and Sarah Kelley (Boston Harbor Association), Sherri Brokopp and Aaron Toffler (Urban Ecology Institute) and Manlio Mendez and Stacey Chacker (NOAH).

  1. Meeting Minutes: December 11th meeting minutes were accepted.

  2. Updates/News/Misc:
  • Boston Greenspace Alliance is holding a public forum focusing on the importance of Parks and Greenspace, Great Hall, Codman Square Health Center, Sat. Feb. 1st from 8:30 to 2 p.m.

  • "Environmental Justice Across the Mystic" Public Forum, sponsored by Mystic River Watershed Assn, Tufts and others. The purpose of this meeting is to speak out regarding environmental concerns in your neighborhood, and to hear about work in other areas of the Mystic. Tuesday, Feb. 18th , 7 P.M. at the Harborside Community Center.

  • Designated Port Area meeting – Jan. 16th at the Harborside regarding the E. Boston Designated Port Area. Comments due by Jan. 23rd. Stacey and Aaron will write comments on behalf of CCAG. Message is that CCAG doesn’t want compromises made on Chelsea Creek due to decisions made on the rest of the waterfront.

  • Belle Steel – EB-CCAG submitted comments to Boston Redevelopment Authority (BRA). Project proponents listed community benefits as landscaping, repaving, extensive security, rehab of building, increased property taxes, 75 construction jobs and low traffic uses. BRA is meeting to make a decision regarding Article 80 on 1/16. Tonight 1/15, at 8:30, project proponents are going before the Boston Conservation Commission. Aaron and Sherri left the meeting early to attend.

  • Duke Energy/Algonquin Gas Transmission Company – Everett Expansion Project: Aaron,, Roseann and Vinny attended an "informational open house" in Chelsea on Jan. 14th (there is one in East Boston tonight, 1/15). Aaron explained that Duke Energy is planning to bring in a 24" gas pipe via E. Boston and Chelsea to Everett. It would be connected to a line at Deer Island in the Boston Harbor and would pass through Logan Airport, up Coleridge and Addison Streets, by Belle Steel building, under Chelsea St. Bridge, along Marginal St. in Chelsea. There would be a spur with an 8" pipe right by Belle Steel to serve Key Span. EB-CCAG members expressed concerns regarding environmental, safety, health and quality of life issues. Lauri Webster is setting up a meeting with Duke Energy and East Boston/Chelsea environmental groups. Lou said that the Mass Lobsterman Assn has know about this issue for several years, and originally was opposed due to concerns regarding fishing gear and habitat. Stacey will contact Lou Adler from the Assn (Scituate). Susan will do some research on the internet. Big question is what are the costs and benefits to E.B. and Chelsea. CCAG will follow this issue.

  • NOAH is advertising for Program Coordinator for CCAG youth and other programs. Stacey handed out the job description, which includes organizing a committee for the Urban Wild (for 15 years, $12,500 /year for this position is being paid for from the Supplemental Environmental Project). If you know someone who may be interested and qualified, contact Stacey.

  • Boudreau Boatyard: Leigh reported about the Boston Board of Appeals hearing on 1/14. Leigh, Stacey, Anna Lane and Helen McCormick attended. Boudreau’s lawyer, Chip Nyler, lobbied that the site had been used for marine industrial purposes without interruption for 100 years (they need to demonstrate that it has been used for this purpose since 1968, when Boston zoning was put in place). If you know any break in this usage, please contact Stacey. The case is now going to Boston’s Law Dept. At the hearing, Mr. Nyler stated that Boudreau would be happy to put conditions on his permit. EB-CCAG will submit a letter (similar to those already submitted), with the following additional conditions: No standing vehicles that are not being used for industrial purposes; no dry dock; before the permit is approved, CCAG wants to know the future use, finish cleaning up the site.

  • Chelsea Creek Rail Trail (the railroad line along Route 1A). National Parks Service (NPS) asked us to give the New England Foundation for the Arts (NEFA) a tour to see if they are interested in partnering with CCAG and NPS on an art project to promote the trail. Stacey will be taking them on a tour on February 3rd at 10 a.m. Lucy and/or Susan will join the tour.

  1. Condor Street Urban Wild - Luke Murray from Parks Dept. was unable to attend. Below is a summary of the written material that he provided.

  • Construction Update: "Webster Engineering (the contractor) has been focused on earth moving and capping efforts. The soil that was excavated from the marsh was redistributed through out the site in the shape of several landforms. The "cone" section has now been completely molded into form and the pathways have been cut into the landscape. During the earthwork shifting operation it came to our attention that the original calculations with regard to the soil quantities were incorrect. Due to the large amount of material excavated from the marsh an excess of 6,000 cubic yards of material needed to be capped throughout the site. To address this issue I (Luke) met with Webster Engineering and Hargreaves Associates to develop a new plan that raised a portion of the site by 4’ and extended the site boundary more toward the DPW yard. By raising certain areas of the site and expanding the boundary limits we were able to… maintain the original design intent and minimize changes to the original plan for the site. However, the additional soil removal will come between $20,000 and $30,000."

The site is at sub grade and the contractor expects to have all capping material on site by

January 17th. I (Luke) performed a site inspection with Hargreaves to verify the grades and proper landforms. Once the contractor has finished capping, they will stop for the winter. The entire site will be rolled to compact the capping material, and hay bales and silt fencing will be put in place to prevent any erosion over the winter. Contractor also began pier construction. The piles have been cut and capped to their specified height and decking has begun. Pier will be complete, minus the railing, by late next week. Temporary fencing will be placed along the front of the pier to restrict access. If you have questions, call Luke at Parks at 617-961-3031.

  • Pros and cons of stone dust pathways vs. exposed aggregate concrete.

Stone Dust: The current material specified for most of the paths is compacted stone dust, which would be a 4-inch layer of stone dust over a 4-inch base of crushed aggregate. The central pathway leading up the cone section is proposed as top-seeded asphalt due to a steeper incline. Stone dust is a very fine, semi-permeable material used often for residential landscapes, woodland walks and golf courses. It is a cost effective alternative for many landscapes. Benefits: a) it’s semi-porous; b) It’s relatively easy to patch, although it becomes tough if material migrates; and c) It’s natural looking. Cons: a) It tends to loosen over time and to erode and shift; b) Even with steel edging, it will eventually creep into unwanted areas, killing the grasses along the edge and creating erosion lines in the pathway channel; c) It will migrate over time, creating a wear line in the middle of pathway that must be replenished on a regular basis; d) Since it is semi-porous, over time, weeds will begin to proliferate and take over. This would require a significant amount of maintenance, especially in areas where herbicides are not preferable; and e) The edging (galvanized material) will eventually chip and rust. Constant battering can dislodge the edging, especially where pathways come to a point. The proposed design, although very interesting and complex, creates many pointed intersections where the steel edging could pose a major maintenance hazard in the future.

Exposed Aggregate Concrete: Exposed aggregate concrete is a highly durable material used often for pathway construction. Parks usually doesn’t use it due to it’s higher than average cost. It is often used on higher end residential and commercial projects where a naturalistic, slip resistant texture is desirable. Pathway construction usually consists of a 4" concrete pad over a 6-inch aggregate base. The entire area is formed using wood strips and the concrete is batched with the specified aggregate in the mix. Once the concrete is floated a special "retarder" agent is applied by a sprayer. This retards the setting of the top 1/4 to 1/2 inch of concrete. After 24 hours the entire pathway is power washed to expose the aggregate underneath. The color of the stone is the major factor in the finish of the concrete. The stone will dictate the color and surface texture of the finish. It is therefore imperative to get the right stone in the mix. Benefits: a) Resistance to erosion, durability to foot traffic, slip resistance and a consistent finish; and b) Maintenance is minimal except for possible patching with epoxy should a crack develop. Surface can be easily power washed and swept if necessary to remove grass clippings, leaves, etc. Cons: a) It will eventually break down. However, with proper cleaning and maintenance this finish will last for 20 years or more; b) "Harder" material in appearance; c) More expensive (however, due to the Boston Sand and Gravel settlement to provide us with up to $25,000 worth of concrete, there would be no net difference in cost to go with the exposed finish concrete).

  • Luke spoke with Hargreaves Associates who stated that they prefer the concrete, and that brush finish concrete was originally proposed for the site. Luke recommends exposed aggregate texture as believes that will result in a more natural and fitting finish for the space.

  • Luke provided photos from a project in Warwick, RI, installed in 1998. He reported that 4 years later, the concrete was in perfect condition with no evidence of weeds, heaving, or cracking. Leigh brought in pictures from in front of the Museum of Science.

  • Participants discussed pros and cons of both (big con for exposed aggregate concrete being that with joints it may look like a sidewalk and could crack). Maddy pointed out that she has had exposed aggregate concrete paths for 51 years at her house, with no cracking. Participants voted that pathways should be exposed aggregate concrete. Luke will bring samples of different color aggregate to the next meeting.

  • Luke is willing to take EB-CCAG members on a guided tour of the site on a Saturday in February or March (Luke subsequently proposed Saturday, February 22nd at 10 A.M.).

  • Lou inquired if the outfall pipe at the urban wild pipe is new. It is, as it was part of the Boston Water and Sewer project. Lou said that he got a new outfall pipe at Channel Fish as well, and that these two should take care of Condor Street flooding problems.

  1. MWRA building, 605 Chelsea Street.
  • In mid-December (after our December EB-CCAG meeting), we learned that MassPort had requested to acquire the old MWRA building (next to the Chelsea Street Bridget) through State surplus program for "traffic mitigation" with boat storage, vehicle storage, maritime use, etc. 

  • CCAG submitted letters requesting information/voicing concerns/making requests to the following parties: Mass Dept of Capital Asset Management; MassPort (asking them to give CCAG one floor of the building for community purposes), MWRA). CCAG also submitted a letter to Boston Landmarks Commission (BLC) to request that it be designated an historic site.

  • We learned that if a building is being given from one State agency to anther, we may request part (or all) of the building, however, legislation would need to be passed for this purpose.

  • CCAG requested a meeting with Senator Travaglini to discuss this issue; however he is presently unavailable, but will try to send a staff person to a meeting that we are requesting with Rep. Petrucelli, Senator Barrios, and others. Bobby, Maddy, and Lucy volunteered to attend this meeting if available.

  • Members expressed opposition to MassPort getting this building as it is seen as MassPort encroachment into the community, and CCAG would like the building for community use.

  1. EB-CCAG Year-in –Review
  • We reviewed a summary of projects (see attached is you were not at the meeting) from Sept. 2001 to December 2002. We then went back to the areas where there were questions to review what were priorities. Some projects are currently underway, or are in initial stages, and all agreed that these should remain priorities. These include the Hess site, Urban Wild programming, Chelsea Creek Rail Trail, new youth program, Boudreau, Belle Steel, MWRA.

 

  • Comments about the following:
    • American Legion Field House – Maddy has petition with 500 signatures, and a teacher that is interested in working with her. We should bring up Field House at a meeting w/ Rep. Petrucelli as he plays baseball there.
    • Boston Public Works Yard – Although there are still problems on the site (such as garbage, now hidden by the fence), it was agreed that we should focus on the bigger picture – meaning what is happening with that site, did the City purchase the MBTA site yet, is the police station going there, when is design set to begin. During this process, we should advocate for open space, building for salt storage, etc.
    • All voted to maintain Executive Committee that we voted in August 2001 – Ana Maria Gomez, Lucy DelMuto, Vinny Ieni, and Nancei Radicchi. Stacey said that this group had never met, but that she called upon them to attend special meetings, to speak at press conferences and events, for advice, etc. Nancei chairs EB-CCAG meetings. Decided that Executive Committee should meet at least every other month.

    • Membership: Agreed that we should begin a membership campaign, but not to charge any fee. To be a member, an individual must sign on to support EB-CCAG’s mission.
    • DPW yard/police station – need to find out what’s going on with this project. Don’t spend time fighting DPW yard – work on advocating for the big picture.
    • Condor Street: There is disagreement whether the ultimate goal is to close off Condor Street (and connect the parks). This issue will need to be –further discussed.

Minutes submitted by Stacey Chacker. Call 617-569-0059 ext. 13 with corrections or additions.

EB-CCAG 2003 meeting schedule

All meetings, unless otherwise indicated will be at 6:30 p.m. at the Harborside.

In case of snow (and the Harborside is closed) our meeting will be held the following Wednesday.

February 12th March 12th April 9th May 14th June 11th July 9th August 13th September 10th October 8th

November 12th December 10th

 

Minutes submitted by Stacey Chacker. Call 617-569-0059 ext. 13 with corrections or additions.


Source of meeting minutes: Stacey.Chacker@noahcdc.org Contact her for more information.