| |

Disclaimer: In an effort to foster a better
informed citizenry with regard to its local affairs,
eastboston.com provides these
documents in electronic form as a public service. EBOL bears no
responsibility for typographical errors. Contact the document writers for
hard copies. Some documents have been scanned;others have been
obtained through e-mail and cut and pasted here. Please send comments and suggestions to editor@eastboston.com
East Boston - Chelsea
Creek Action Group
Meeting Minutes --
January 15, 2003
MEETING MINUTES – January 15, 2003
Attending: Leigh Hall, Lucy Del Muto, Ana Maria Gomez, Nancei Radicchi,
Roberta Horn, Arthur Horn, Robertson Ward, Grace Zuccaro, Aldo Ciraoe, Maddy
McComiskey, Mary Ellen Welch, Patricia Fidler, Susan Voloshian, Christopher
Blackler, Louis Silvestro (Channel Fish), Todd Kohr and Sarah Kelley (Boston
Harbor Association), Sherri Brokopp and Aaron Toffler (Urban Ecology
Institute) and Manlio Mendez and Stacey Chacker (NOAH).
- Meeting Minutes: December 11th meeting minutes were
accepted.
- Updates/News/Misc:
- Boston Greenspace Alliance is holding a public forum focusing on the
importance of Parks and Greenspace, Great Hall, Codman Square Health
Center, Sat. Feb. 1st from 8:30 to 2 p.m.
"Environmental Justice Across the Mystic" Public Forum, sponsored by
Mystic River Watershed Assn, Tufts and others. The purpose of this meeting
is to speak out regarding environmental concerns in your neighborhood, and
to hear about work in other areas of the Mystic. Tuesday, Feb. 18th
, 7 P.M. at the Harborside Community Center.
Designated Port Area meeting – Jan. 16th at the Harborside
regarding the E. Boston Designated Port Area. Comments due by Jan. 23rd.
Stacey and Aaron will write comments on behalf of CCAG. Message is that
CCAG doesn’t want compromises made on Chelsea Creek due to decisions made
on the rest of the waterfront.
Belle Steel – EB-CCAG submitted comments to Boston Redevelopment
Authority (BRA). Project proponents listed community benefits as
landscaping, repaving, extensive security, rehab of building, increased
property taxes, 75 construction jobs and low traffic uses. BRA is meeting
to make a decision regarding Article 80 on 1/16. Tonight 1/15, at 8:30,
project proponents are going before the Boston Conservation Commission.
Aaron and Sherri left the meeting early to attend.
Duke Energy/Algonquin Gas Transmission Company – Everett Expansion
Project: Aaron,, Roseann and Vinny attended an "informational open house"
in Chelsea on Jan. 14th (there is one in East Boston tonight,
1/15). Aaron explained that Duke Energy is planning to bring in a 24" gas
pipe via E. Boston and Chelsea to Everett. It would be connected to a line
at Deer Island in the Boston Harbor and would pass through Logan Airport,
up Coleridge and Addison Streets, by Belle Steel building, under Chelsea
St. Bridge, along Marginal St. in Chelsea. There would be a spur with an
8" pipe right by Belle Steel to serve Key Span. EB-CCAG members expressed
concerns regarding environmental, safety, health and quality of life
issues. Lauri Webster is setting up a meeting with Duke Energy and East
Boston/Chelsea environmental groups. Lou said that the Mass Lobsterman
Assn has know about this issue for several years, and originally was
opposed due to concerns regarding fishing gear and habitat. Stacey will
contact Lou Adler from the Assn (Scituate). Susan will do some research on
the internet. Big question is what are the costs and benefits to E.B. and
Chelsea. CCAG will follow this issue.
NOAH is advertising for Program Coordinator for CCAG youth and other
programs. Stacey handed out the job description, which includes organizing
a committee for the Urban Wild (for 15 years, $12,500 /year for this
position is being paid for from the Supplemental Environmental Project).
If you know someone who may be interested and qualified, contact Stacey.
Boudreau Boatyard: Leigh reported about the Boston Board of Appeals
hearing on 1/14. Leigh, Stacey, Anna Lane and Helen McCormick attended.
Boudreau’s lawyer, Chip Nyler, lobbied that the site had been used for
marine industrial purposes without interruption for 100 years (they need
to demonstrate that it has been used for this purpose since 1968, when
Boston zoning was put in place). If you know any break in this usage,
please contact Stacey. The case is now going to Boston’s Law Dept. At the
hearing, Mr. Nyler stated that Boudreau would be happy to put conditions
on his permit. EB-CCAG will submit a letter (similar to those already
submitted), with the following additional conditions: No standing vehicles
that are not being used for industrial purposes; no dry dock; before the
permit is approved, CCAG wants to know the future use, finish cleaning up
the site.
Chelsea Creek Rail Trail (the railroad line along Route 1A). National
Parks Service (NPS) asked us to give the New England Foundation for the
Arts (NEFA) a tour to see if they are interested in partnering with CCAG
and NPS on an art project to promote the trail. Stacey will be taking them
on a tour on February 3rd at 10 a.m. Lucy and/or Susan will
join the tour.
Condor Street Urban Wild - Luke Murray from Parks Dept. was unable to
attend. Below is a summary of the written material that he provided.
Construction Update: "Webster Engineering (the contractor) has been
focused on earth moving and capping efforts. The soil that was excavated
from the marsh was redistributed through out the site in the shape of
several landforms. The "cone" section has now been completely molded into
form and the pathways have been cut into the landscape. During the
earthwork shifting operation it came to our attention that the original
calculations with regard to the soil quantities were incorrect. Due to the
large amount of material excavated from the marsh an excess of 6,000 cubic
yards of material needed to be capped throughout the site. To address this
issue I (Luke) met with Webster Engineering and Hargreaves Associates to
develop a new plan that raised a portion of the site by 4’ and extended
the site boundary more toward the DPW yard. By raising certain areas of
the site and expanding the boundary limits we were able to… maintain the
original design intent and minimize changes to the original plan for the
site. However, the additional soil removal will come between $20,000 and
$30,000."
The site is at sub grade and the contractor expects to
have all capping material on site by
January 17th. I (Luke) performed a site
inspection with Hargreaves to verify the grades and proper landforms.
Once the contractor has finished capping, they will stop for the winter.
The entire site will be rolled to compact the capping material, and hay
bales and silt fencing will be put in place to prevent any erosion over
the winter. Contractor also began pier construction. The piles have been
cut and capped to their specified height and decking has begun. Pier
will be complete, minus the railing, by late next week. Temporary
fencing will be placed along the front of the pier to restrict access.
If you have questions, call Luke at Parks at 617-961-3031.
Pros and cons of stone dust pathways vs. exposed aggregate concrete.
Stone Dust: The current material specified for most of
the paths is compacted stone dust, which would be a 4-inch layer of
stone dust over a 4-inch base of crushed aggregate. The central pathway
leading up the cone section is proposed as top-seeded asphalt due to a
steeper incline. Stone dust is a very fine, semi-permeable material used
often for residential landscapes, woodland walks and golf courses. It is
a cost effective alternative for many landscapes. Benefits: a) it’s
semi-porous; b) It’s relatively easy to patch, although it becomes tough
if material migrates; and c) It’s natural looking. Cons: a) It tends to
loosen over time and to erode and shift; b) Even with steel edging, it
will eventually creep into unwanted areas, killing the grasses along the
edge and creating erosion lines in the pathway channel; c) It will
migrate over time, creating a wear line in the middle of pathway that
must be replenished on a regular basis; d) Since it is semi-porous, over
time, weeds will begin to proliferate and take over. This would require
a significant amount of maintenance, especially in areas where
herbicides are not preferable; and e) The edging (galvanized material)
will eventually chip and rust. Constant battering can dislodge the
edging, especially where pathways come to a point. The proposed design,
although very interesting and complex, creates many pointed
intersections where the steel edging could pose a major maintenance
hazard in the future.
Exposed Aggregate Concrete: Exposed aggregate
concrete is a highly durable material used often for pathway
construction. Parks usually doesn’t use it due to it’s higher than
average cost. It is often used on higher end residential and commercial
projects where a naturalistic, slip resistant texture is desirable.
Pathway construction usually consists of a 4" concrete pad over a 6-inch
aggregate base. The entire area is formed using wood strips and the
concrete is batched with the specified aggregate in the mix. Once the
concrete is floated a special "retarder" agent is applied by a sprayer.
This retards the setting of the top 1/4 to 1/2 inch of concrete. After
24 hours the entire pathway is power washed to expose the aggregate
underneath. The color of the stone is the major factor in the finish of
the concrete. The stone will dictate the color and surface texture of
the finish. It is therefore imperative to get the right stone in the
mix. Benefits: a) Resistance to erosion, durability to foot traffic,
slip resistance and a consistent finish; and b) Maintenance is minimal
except for possible patching with epoxy should a crack develop. Surface
can be easily power washed and swept if necessary to remove grass
clippings, leaves, etc. Cons: a) It will eventually break down. However,
with proper cleaning and maintenance this finish will last for 20 years
or more; b) "Harder" material in appearance; c) More expensive (however,
due to the Boston Sand and Gravel settlement to provide us with up to
$25,000 worth of concrete, there would be no net difference in cost to
go with the exposed finish concrete).
Luke spoke with Hargreaves Associates who stated that they prefer
the concrete, and that brush finish concrete was originally proposed for
the site. Luke recommends exposed aggregate texture as believes that will
result in a more natural and fitting finish for the space.
Luke provided photos from a project in Warwick, RI, installed in 1998.
He reported that 4 years later, the concrete was in perfect condition with
no evidence of weeds, heaving, or cracking. Leigh brought in pictures from
in front of the Museum of Science.
Participants discussed pros and cons of both (big con for exposed
aggregate concrete being that with joints it may look like a sidewalk and
could crack). Maddy pointed out that she has had exposed aggregate
concrete paths for 51 years at her house, with no cracking. Participants
voted that pathways should be exposed aggregate concrete. Luke will bring
samples of different color aggregate to the next meeting.
Luke is willing to take EB-CCAG members on a guided tour of the site
on a Saturday in February or March (Luke subsequently proposed Saturday,
February 22nd at 10 A.M.).
Lou inquired if the outfall pipe at the urban wild pipe is new. It is,
as it was part of the Boston Water and Sewer project. Lou said that he got
a new outfall pipe at Channel Fish as well, and that these two should take
care of Condor Street flooding problems.
- MWRA building, 605 Chelsea Street.
- In mid-December (after our December EB-CCAG meeting), we learned that
MassPort had requested to acquire the old MWRA building (next to the
Chelsea Street Bridget) through State surplus program for "traffic
mitigation" with boat storage, vehicle storage, maritime use, etc.
CCAG submitted letters requesting information/voicing concerns/making
requests to the following parties: Mass Dept of Capital Asset Management;
MassPort (asking them to give CCAG one floor of the building for community
purposes), MWRA). CCAG also submitted a letter to Boston Landmarks
Commission (BLC) to request that it be designated an historic site.
We learned that if a building is being given from one State agency to
anther, we may request part (or all) of the building, however, legislation
would need to be passed for this purpose.
CCAG requested a meeting with Senator Travaglini to discuss this
issue; however he is presently unavailable, but will try to send a staff
person to a meeting that we are requesting with Rep. Petrucelli, Senator
Barrios, and others. Bobby, Maddy, and Lucy volunteered to attend this
meeting if available.
Members expressed opposition to MassPort getting
this building as it is seen as MassPort encroachment into the community,
and CCAG would like the building for community use.
EB-CCAG Year-in –Review
- We reviewed a summary of projects (see attached is you were not at the
meeting) from Sept. 2001 to December 2002. We then went back to the areas
where there were questions to review what were priorities. Some projects
are currently underway, or are in initial stages, and all agreed that
these should remain priorities. These include the Hess site, Urban Wild
programming, Chelsea Creek Rail Trail, new youth program, Boudreau, Belle
Steel, MWRA.
Comments about the following:
- American Legion Field House – Maddy has petition with 500
signatures, and a teacher that is interested in working with her. We
should bring up Field House at a meeting w/ Rep. Petrucelli as he plays
baseball there.
- Boston Public Works Yard – Although there are still problems on the
site (such as garbage, now hidden by the fence), it was agreed that we
should focus on the bigger picture – meaning what is happening with that
site, did the City purchase the MBTA site yet, is the police station
going there, when is design set to begin. During this process, we should
advocate for open space, building for salt storage, etc.
- All voted to maintain Executive Committee that we voted in August
2001 – Ana Maria Gomez, Lucy DelMuto, Vinny Ieni, and Nancei Radicchi.
Stacey said that this group had never met, but that she called upon them
to attend special meetings, to speak at press conferences and events,
for advice, etc. Nancei chairs EB-CCAG meetings. Decided that Executive
Committee should meet at least every other month.
Membership: Agreed that we should begin a membership campaign, but
not to charge any fee. To be a member, an individual must sign on to
support EB-CCAG’s mission.
DPW yard/police station – need to find out what’s going on with this
project. Don’t spend time fighting DPW yard – work on advocating for the
big picture.
Condor Street: There is disagreement whether the ultimate goal is to
close off Condor Street (and connect the parks). This issue will need to
be –further discussed.
Minutes submitted by Stacey Chacker. Call 617-569-0059
ext. 13 with corrections or additions.
EB-CCAG 2003 meeting schedule
All meetings, unless otherwise indicated
will be at 6:30 p.m. at the Harborside.
In case of snow (and the Harborside is
closed) our meeting will be held the following Wednesday.
February 12th
March 12th April 9th May 14th June 11th
July 9th August 13th September 10th October
8th
November 12th December 10th
Minutes submitted by Stacey Chacker. Call 617-569-0059
ext. 13 with corrections or additions.
Source of meeting minutes: Stacey.Chacker@noahcdc.org Contact her for
more information.
|