| |

Disclaimer: In an effort to foster a better
informed citizenry with regard to its local affairs,
eastboston.com provides these
documents in electronic form as a public service. EBOL bears no
responsibility for typographical errors. Contact the document writers for
hard copies. Some documents have been scanned;others have been
obtained through e-mail and cut and pasted here. Please send comments and suggestions to editor@eastboston.com
East Boston - Chelsea
Creek Action Group
Meeting Minutes --
February 12, 2003
Attending: Leigh Hall, Lucy Del Muto, Nancei Radicchi, Ethan
Hoag, Roberta Horn, Vinny Ieni, Lauri Webster, Jim Linthwaide, Gail Miller,
Arthur Horn, Robertson Ward, Mary Ellen Welch, Patricia Fidler, Susan
Voloshian, Christopher Blackler, Diane Albano (Councilor Scapicchio’s
office), Debra Blandin (Police, District 7), Roseann Bongiovanni (Chelsea
Greenspace), Sherri Brokopp and Aaron Toffler (Urban Ecology Institute), Gus
McLachlan (Maritimes & Northeast Pipeline), Jon Bonsall (Keegan, Werlin and
Pabian , LLP), Pete Woody and Franklin Gessner (Algonquin Gas Trans Co.),
Rick Paquette (TRC Environmental), and Stacey Chacker (NOAH).
Meeting Minutes: January 15th meeting minutes
were accepted.
Updates/News/Misc:
-
"Environmental Justice Across the Mystic" Public Forum ,
has been changed to 2/25, 7 P.M. at the Harborside. This will be an
opportunity to learn from the efforts of the Northern Rhode Island
Conservation District regarding their work along the Woonasquatucket River
in R.I.
-
Annual Toxics Action Conference , Sat, 3/8 at
Northeastern U. NOAH has two free tickets; Chelsea has two more. Pat and
Susan plan to go. If others are, please contact Stacey.
-
Chelsea Creek Rail Trail:
Lucy and Stacey took representatives from National Parks Service and New
England Foundation for the Arts (NEFA) on a tour to see the rail corridor
along Route 1A. NEFA is applying to the National Endowment for the Arts to
get funds to work with local groups. If they receive funds, they will
choose groups to sponsor public art projects that would promote projects
(e.g. Rail Trail). Funds about $50,000. We should hear by May 2003.
-
CCAG submitted an "Active Living" pre-proposal to
the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation with UEI, Chelsea, Boston Natural Areas
Network and East Boston Neighborhood Health Center. The grant would fund
"active programs" – like organized walks, canoe trips, etc, and planning
for the continuation of the East Boston Greenway and the Chelsea Creek
Rail Trail.
-
Friends of Belle Isle Annual Meeting – Sun, 3/9, 2
P.M. at Our Lady of Lourdes, 1 Endicott Avenue, Revere. Karl Pastore of
EOEA, will present Belle Isle Marsh inventory/problems.
-
Condor Street Urban Wild Tour set for 2/22 at 10 a.m.;
please note: this tour has been postponed (tentative date: Sat 3/29).
Aaron asked about putting BBQ’s on the site. It was brought up that having
open fires on public property in the City is illegal; many participants
also had concerns regarding safety.
-
EB-CCAG Exec, Committee (Ana Maria, Vinny, Nancei, and
Lucy) now meeting regularly to address other issues that we do not have
time for at monthly meetings. At next meeting, we will meet with reps from
East Boston Artists Group to see if we may work together.
-
Meeting w/ U.S. Representative Capuano: Gail,
Stacey, Aaron, Anita McCandless, Roseann, and Dora Santaniello attended to
discuss Chelsea Creek Vision Plan, specific projects, Duke Energy, etc.
Rep. agreed to look into MWRA building and MassPort’s attempt to purchase
it. Rep has concerns about Algonquin pipeline; CCAG will remain in touch
with him re: this issue. Rep supportive of efforts to work with Trust for
Public Land (TPL) to purchase Hess site.
-
Hess:
Nancy Kafka and Badge Blackett from TPL, and Stacey and Morgan Wilson of
NOAH met with Deputy General Counsel and consultant from Hess regarding
the possibility of TPL purchasing an option on Hess site. Meeting was
positive; they were impressed with TPL’s work, open to the idea, and said
that they realized that any redevelopment of the Hess site must include
significant open space. Next steps: TPL will submit concept paper on how a
real estate transaction would be structured, and will meet with Hess
officials in NY.
-
Environmental Justice Demonstration Project: Chelsea Creek
Restoration Project (CCRP) is one of 15 projects nationally from EPA to
get this designation (an initiative of Clinton’s, continued with Bush
Admin). CCRP will be held up as national model working on environmental
justice and different federal agencies should be available to provide
technical assistance towards our goals. EPA Region 1 is making a
commitment to organize internally to provide more coordinated efforts
regarding Creek enforcement and other issues. Kudos to everyone who has
worked so hard to make CCAG efforts so successful.
Duke Energy/Algonquin Gas Transmission Company –
Duke/Algonquin representatives and consultants made a
power point presentation (if you would like a copy, contact Stacey), with
the following information:
-
Proposed Algonquin gas line originates in Sable Island,
off Nova Scotia. The gas source was found in 1970’s; piping began in
1990’s. It is estimated that reserves could exceed the Gulf Coast, and
that supply will last 50-100 years. Currently this source provides 10% of
New England’s Gas Supply. Maritimes plans to double its capacity by 2006.
-
There is a pipeline from Salem to Quincy that was
constructed in Sept. 2002. It is expected to be in service by the end of
this summer. It is called the Hub Line project.
-
Everett Extension Project: Proposal is to have 7-mile
pipeline (24 and 8-inch diameters) (3 miles offshore and 4 onshore) that
would connect to Hub Line at Deer Island. Proposed route is via Airport,
through Constitution Beach and tennis courts, cross Bennington and
Saratoga Sts, via Brandywyne Village, behind Addison St, by Budget
Rent-a-Car, south on Chelsea Creek on rail corridor – with spur to Keyspan
connection, under Chelsea Creek by Chelsea Bridge, down Marginal Street in
Chelsea to Williams Street and through to Everett). There would be four
meter/regulator stations (Keyspan in East Boston, and Exelon (Everett
power plant line), District Gas LNG facility, and Algonquin in Everett).
It would be in service in 2005.
-
Stated benefits: a) Increased supplies to Greater Boston;
b) Enhance energy reliability and security; c) Decrease reliance on
foreign oil; d) Increase competition in wholesale energy market; e)
Increase fuel diversity; f) Enhance operating efficiency of Algonquin
System; and g) Improve regional air quality.
-
Siting Process: a) Evaluate preliminary route and proposed
alternate routes; b) Contact landowners to obtain survey permission; c)
Work with municipalities, landowners and agencies to identify issues; d)
Sponsor open houses prior to filing Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC)
application (filed on 2/5/03); e) Notify impacted landowners of FERC
filing within 3 business days (after FERC notices application); and f)
Copies of FERC application in Winthrop, Chelsea, EB libraries, City
Council, City Manager and Mayor. Throughout process Duke will continue to
refine pipeline route based on input from municipalities, landowners and
permitting agencies. Goal: Select route that minimizes impacts to
residences, businesses and environment while meeting project requirements.
-
Siting Process – FERC (makes final decision for pipeline
route): a) Review takes 6-10 months; b) Balances project need v.s. project
impacts; c) Issues Notice of Application and sets forth Intervention and
Comment Process; d) Notices preparation of an Environmental Assessment,
with public comment period; e) Holds Scoping Hearing to receive public
comment; f) Reviews public comments; g) Issues an Environmental
Assessment; and h) Makes determination whether to issue a certificate to
build pipeline.
-
Siting Process –MA Energy Facilities Siting Board: a)
Holds Regional Info Hearing(s); and b) Submits Comments to FERC on behalf
of citizens and local communities.
-
Environmental Review: What is done to protect environment?
Algonquin: a) Conducted extensive onshore and offshore surveys; b) Will
comply with applicable federal, state and local environmental regulations;
c) Will use advanced technology to minimize environmental impacts; d) Will
work with agencies to develop offshore monitoring processes; e) Will
comply with FERC’s construction procedures to minimize wetland and water
body impacts; and f) Has developed detailed soil erosion control plan.
-
Agency Oversight: Federal Permit Review:
a) FERC; b) Army Corps of Engineers; c) US EPA; c) US Fish and Wildlife
Service; d) US National Marine and Fisheries Service; and e) US Coast
Guard. Mass State Permits/Reviews: a) Mass Environmental Policy Act –
Notice of project change and File Environmental Impact Report; b) Coastal
Zone Management; c) Department of Environmental Protection; d) State
Historic Preservation Office; e) Mass Natural Heritage and Endangered
Species Program; and f) Mass Highway Dept. Local Permits Reviews (Boston,
Chelsea, Everett): a) Municipal Conservation Commissions; b) Depts. of
Public Works (for road permits); c) Fire Depts (for blasting permits); and
d) Municipal Harbor Masters.
-
Property Issues: 1) Typical Construction Work Area: a) 50
ft of permanent right of way w/ 25 ft of temporary workspace (additional
in some areas); b) Street construction limited to road right-of-way. 2)
Use of easement: Most uses still can continue except for installation of
permanent structures.
-
Showed aerial photos to show construction process: 1)
Offshore: Horizontal Directional Drills (HDDs) and conventional dredging
will be used from Deer Island to East Boston, under the Harbor and
Airport, and to cross the Chelsea River. HDDs drill underground – using a
6 inch drill bit, going at a 30 degree angle underground (includes
underwater) 60 to 100 ft. They can go for 1000 to 5000 feet and then pop
up. They will continue to drill with larger drill bits until the hole is
large enough for the 24" pipeline. Using this technique on Chelsea River
so as not to disturb contaminated sediments, utility lines, and shipping
channel. 2) Onshore: a) Advise landowners of construction schedule; b)
Re-survey and mark route and work area; c) Clear construction right-of-way
where required; d) Install soil erosion devices where required; e) Grade
construction area and separate top soil where required; f) Implement
traffic control plan; g) Dig trench for pipeline; h) Weld pipe together
and inspect welds (both in-street and non-street construction); i)
Backfill and hydrostatically test; and j) Final clean-up, restoration and
repaving.
-
Construction: What protective measures does Algonquin pun
in place to prevent damage to the pipe?: a) Pipeline is built of high
strength carbon steel; b) It is coated externally with a corrosion
resistant, not-conductive inert material; c) East joint is welded by
certified welders; d) Each weld is x-rayed to verify integrity; e)
Pipeline is cathodically protected; f) Hydrostatically tested at high
pressure to ensure structural integrity prior to being placed into
service; g) Generally installed at a minimum of 3 feet beneath the
surface; h) Not susceptible to frost heaves; and i) Aboveground or flush
markers installed in line-of-sight intervals.
-
Operation and Maintenance: a) U.S. Dept. of Transportation
(DOT) overlooks: 1) Pipeline is designed, constructed and operated to meet
or exceed safety requirements as exclusively governed by US DOT; 2) US DOT
performs periodic inspections of pipeline operator; b) National
Transportation Safety Board – Interstate natural gas pipeline system is
the safest energy delivery system in the nation; c) Algonquin’s
procedures: 1) Visual inspection – on foot, vehicle and air; 2) "Dig Safe"
program: "Outside forces" are cited as the primary cause for reportable
accidents; 3) Community liaison meetings and mailings; 4) Computerized gas
monitoring system electronically monitors the operations of the pipeline:
Remote control valves and pipeline pressures are read every 60 seconds or
less; 5) Commercially available odorant is added.
CCAG members posed questions to Duke/Algonquin reps. Below
are responses to the questions:
-
Mobil/Exxon owns Sable Island gas.
-
FERC has never denied any pipeline project.
-
Alternate Routes: Stated that: 1) cannot put pipeline
through Boston Inner Harbor due to MBTA, Callahan, Williams and Sumner
Tunnels (Williams is 15 feet below surface) and they are not allowed to
close down the Federal Shipping Channel. Also said cannot go south of
Logan due to possibility of new runway; 2) they switched their route due
to reaction from Coleridge Street residents, also not going through
Winthrop Streets or Eagle Square.
-
Sediments will not be disturbed at Constitution Beach;
they’ll use HDD to drill 50 ft below the ground, coming up by the tennis
courts.
-
Not sure which side of the chain link fence they would be
on along Chelsea Creek – on top of the rail corridor, or parallel to. They
cannot give all specifics as still doing surveying and then meeting
w/property owners.
-
On land, pipeline will be 3 ft below surface, except on
roads and parking lots where will be 5 feet below. Crossing Rte 1A, if
there are utility lines, it will be even deeper down.
-
They are not sure if the connection to District Gas will
bring in more LNG’s (Liquefied Natural Gas tankers) through the Harbor;
stated that they are not privy to District Gas’ business plan. However, it
was clear that District Gas would be using this pipeline to sell gas that
they vaporize, as they do not have equipment to liquefy natural gas (they
would need to put in new facilities to do this); they currently have 2
tanks to hold liquefied gas that comes in on LNGs. They will be paying to
use the Algonquin line as a transport system for the vaporized gas. It
seemed a clear possibility to CCAG members that more LNG’s would be coming
through the Harbor; and everyone is concerned about this.
-
Keyspan and Everett Power Plant are purchasing gas.
-
Algonquin pipeline runs along Rte 128 - connects to W.
Mass and then runs south to NJ, NY and Conn.
-
Don’t believe that having a pipeline through neighborhood
will increase homeowner’s insurance rates.
-
CCAG member pointed out that there is on average one
accident/day in the U.S. related to pipelines. There was a catastrophic
fire in E.B. many years ago, blowing up houses sporadically; no one
anticipated this disaster. Duke representatives said that Algonquin has
been running pipelines since 1950’s and there has never been a
cartographic accident. However they try to improve each pipeline they
build. Lines are "piggable" (meaning they have a machine that goes through
them periodically to determine dents, erosion, wall thickness compromises,
etc). Believes the one/day is related to retail gas lines, and not any
wholesale lines.
-
CCAG member mentioned reading about maintenance violations
and safety concerns – rust, fire, etc. Duke reps stated that during and
after line is constructed, they work with police, fire and EMTs – provide
maps of the pipeline. If there is a call regarding someone smelling gas,
they will respond and determine if an area needs to be evacuated; Duke
does not determine this.
-
Everett Power Plant used Oil #6; switched to natural gas;
generates enough electricity for 2 million homes.
-
Duke Energy does not own the gas that goes through the
pipeline – they are kind of like the Mass Pike – collecting tolls from
those who choose to use their transportation route.
Next Steps: Aaron will write a letter with list of
questions to Jon Bonsall. They will reply with written response. CCAG will
stay in touch with Representative Capuano’s office regarding this issue,
and discuss concerns with politicians in upcoming meetings. Will also
comment to FERC. Maybe invite District Gas to attend CCAG meeting.
MWRA building, 605 Chelsea Street.
-
We’ve heard that MassPort is not eligible to acquire MWRA
building through State surplus program, as they are a State authority.
Rep. Capuano was not sure about this and said that he would do some
further research. Meanwhile, according to our understanding of the process
and the updates that Roseann has received, the Dept. of Capital Asset
Management is now going to notify the City of Boston regarding the
building’s availability. Stacey is in the process of setting up meetings
with politicians. We have a meeting set with Councilor Scapicchio on 2/19
@ 2 P.M. Aaron, Gail, Leigh, and maybe Lucy volunteered to attend with
Stacey.
Belle Steel
-
Boston Conservation Commission: Aaron, Sherri, Gail and
Stacey attended. Conservation Comm. listened to
our concerns regarding public access around building. Asked project
proponents (Grossman Companies) to clarify property lines and to meet with
CCAG reps.
-
Meeting w/ Grossman Companies –(also property owner along
Creek). Lauri, Maddy, Stacey and Aaron attended with Louis Grossman, his
lawyer and consultants. It was a positive meeting. Mr. Grossman was
interested in CCAG’s work, impressed with Chelsea Creek Vision Plan and
stated that he would be willing to work with us. Stacey will follow-up
with a letter outlining what we agreed on at the meeting, and stating
again EB-CCAG’s concerns regarding 150 McClellan Highway development. Will
copy the letter to the Conservation Commission.
-
Boston Redevelopment Authority (BRA) approved the Article
80 process. Project still needs to go before the Zoning Board of Appeals
and before the Conservation Commission again.
Minutes submitted by Stacey Chacker. Call 617-569-0059
ext. 13 with corrections or additions.
Upcoming meetings
March 12th
April 9th
May 14th
June 11th
July 9th
August 13th
September 10th
October
8th
November 12th
December 10th
Minutes submitted by Stacey Chacker. Call 617-569-0059
ext. 13 with corrections or additions.
Source of meeting minutes: Stacey.Chacker@noahcdc.org Contact her for
more information.
|