Maverick
Arts
Bostons
Visual Artsletter
© 2001,
Charles Giuliano
|
By
Charles Giuliano
82 Webster Street
East Boston, 02128
Charles.Giuliano@GTE.net |
February
24, 2001
Issue No.15
archive
Table of
Contents
Media/Metaphor
The 46th
Biennial Exhibition
The Corcoran Gallery of Art
December 9 through March 5
Modern
Art and America: Alfred Stieglitz
and His New York Galleries
The National Gallery of Art
Media/Metaphor
The 46th
Biennial Exhibition
The Corcoran Gallery of Art
While
Washington, D.C. does indeed have
a stunning range of spectacular
museums, most of which are sited
along an enormous central mall,
it is a city in which to
experience Old Masters, V-2
Rockets, Rare Documents, Old
Glory, Dinosaur Bones, and George
Washingtons wooden teeth.
Anything that is but cutting edge
contemporary art. Contemporary
museums and curators fight the
good fight, overall, but this is
a generally conservative culture
dominated by the shadow of
Congress. The Clintons were
hardly known as champions of high
culture, and one may anticipate
even less under the current
Republican administration of W
and friends.
Take
the Corcoran Gallery of Art, for
example, with its mandate for
American art much like that of
the Whitney Museum in New York.
There the similarity ends. A case
in point, their recent and
current Biennial exhibitions.
Nobody liked last years
Whitney Biennial. So, what else
is new. By contrast, the current
Corcoran Biennial, a series that
started more than 90 years ago,
has always been viewed as
somewhat conservative
particularly with its insistence
on concentrating on painting.
They have parted from that
formula this time, allowing in a
lot of photography, video and
installation work. Thats
the hard news. But compared to
last years Whitney Biennial
this looks awful safe and retro.
Much of the work by the 15
artists in this show has that
feeling of déjà vu all over
again.
There
is the sense that the
exhibitions curator, Philip
Brookman, spent a few weekends
running around Chelsea and Soho
and the rest of the time flipping
through back issues of Art Forum
and Art in America. While
generally pleasing to the eye
this show failed to get under my
skin, which is what Biennials
such as the Whitney are designed
to do. This is, after all, the
museum that started the ball of
censorship rolling by canceling
the Mapplethorpe show a few years
back.
The
first pair of galleries on the
main floor sets the pace of what
to expect from this exhibition.
First we encounter more angst and
ennui in the enervating daily
diary of Nan Goldin who appears
to be slogging along through the
worlds most prolonged
documented adolescence. Her
friends make out as if she
isnt there. Perhaps, the
truth is, she really isnt.
There that is. Or all there. Or
whatever. What a wasted life. How
boring. From there we amble on to
that mistress of ultra chic
bimbosity, Miss Cupie Doll 2001,
Lisa Yuskavage. The art world
likes to talk about how well she
paints. Big deal. These are
Playboy cartoons, vintage 1960s,
raised to the epic level of high
art. Just imagine these on the
walls of the homes of the rich
and famous. Actually, these
dont seem like the best
examples of her work. I find John
Currin and Delia Brown, as far as
pinups and sendups go, more
compelling and edgy.
Speaking
of painting, however, here is
where the Corcoran Biennial is at
its best and worst. A room of
small Postcards from Camp, by Ben
Sakoguchi, was absolutely
riveting. These ersatz postcards
present an array of images from a
dark moment in American history;
the internment of Japanese
Americans during World War Two.
The American born artist spent
his childhood years in a camp in
Poston, Arizona. The images, in
bright chromocolors are created
from family snapshots and
historic documents. They convey
an ironic, "having a
wonderful time, wish you were
here," feeling. The
abstract, expressive swirly and
whirly paintings by David Reed,
however, make little sense in
this mix.
The
rest of the show seems to be
dominated by video and
photography, just like a Whitney
or Chelsea show. Victor Burgin
has created a slow moving looping
panorama of the painting
galleries of the Corcoran
juxtaposed by a swoop around a
room in the infamous Watergate.
Sharon Daniel has made an
interactive internet site for the
show that people can play with
through computer terminals, or
surf at home. Gary Hill seems to
be slamming himself against a
wall and blanking out. Michal
Rovner has taken a huge gallery
to play out on three screens a
slow drama of cold war. Something
about Israelis and Russians.
While Jennifer Steinkamp and
Jimmy Johnson have transformed a
rotunda into a playful mirage of
electronic music and dancing
ribbons.
This
time Vik Muniz has laid off the
chocolate syrup. But he has gone
through several generations to
give us large, black and white,
ben day dotted, broken up images
of famous people. A huge wall of
them. Chuck Close presents a
large number of small
daguerreotype images of heads and
tails of his famous and not so
friends. He created these in
collaboration with Jerry
Spangoli. This oldest of all
forms of photography is
remarkable for its precise detail
and lush tonal range. But, we
entirely didnt need the oh
so typical, large, blotchy,
pseudo Seurat portrait of Jasper
Johns. We know all about that. A
Biennial is supposed to present
new work and experimental ideas.
Which
is why the selection of new works
by Shimon Attie was so
successful. We were spared more
of his musings on the Holocaust.
This time he has focused his
social concerns on his own battle
with diabetes. The photo images
are fascinating meditations on
sugar and blood accompanied by a
powerful, three screen video that
surrounds us with mountains of
crunching and lethal white
processed sugar.
In
attempting to reinvent herself,
alas, Lorna Simpson has been less
successful. Her recent attempts
at narrative videos have put me
to sleep. Now she wants to make
me think long and hard about a
full scale, segmented, diptych of
theater seats. There is a small
text that reads, "They
watched and watched and
watched." Yeah, right. Oh,
and, Y. David Chung. Does video
installations. So, I think that
covers everyone.
Modern
Art and America: Alfred Stieglitz
and His New York Galleries
The National Gallery of Art
As
Cherry Blossom Time rapidly
approaches, plan a trip to
Washington for no other reason
than to tour the recently opened
exhibition focusing on the
enormous influence of
photographer/ publisher/
gallerist, Alfred Stieglitz.
Even
before the famous Armory Show of
1913, he was presenting the best
and most progressive work of
European modernists in his tiny
New York spaces. Considering that
there simply were no avant-garde
galleries in America at the time,
his Gallery 291, on Fifth Avenue,
had an influence on American art
and culture all out of proportion
to its minuscule scale.
Stieglitz, a man of some but
relatively moderate means, was
able to support and display a
handful of the most progressive
artists of his generation:
Georgia OKeeffe, Arthur
Dove, John Marin, Marsden
Hartley, Edward Steichen, Paul
Strand, and Charles Demuth.
This
exhibition assembles some of the
signature masterpieces by this
first generation of American
modernists, including a range of
works by Stieglitz himself. These
are images that will be familiar
from textbooks. Not every
masterpiece is here, for example,
the OKeeffe, Cows Head in
Red White and Blue, but why
quibble. The MFA, for example,
has loaned the Dove masterpiece,
That Red One, from its Lane
Collection.
It
is remarkable to what extent
Stieglitz got it right. In
hindsight, OKeeffe,
Hartley, Dove and Demuth look
terrific. Marin. Well, for me
personally, I dont think
so. But, the Hartley German
Military Series, from WW1, they
are some of the greatest
paintings of their time being
produced anywhere in the world.
Not just America. And
OKeeffe, she seems to just
look better all the time.
We
also know by now, chapter and
verse, that Stieglitz was a right
peculiar sortah fellow. He had an
odd way of doing business. And
these artists were often at his
mercy for their monthly stipends.
It is simply remarkable that he
supported them. But he also seems
to have them dance. It adds
curious dimension and humanity to
a great but flawed genius. And
makes us think about the tough
times of his artists. When
America, well, just didnt
give a damn.
-30-
YAll
Come Back
|